Taylor Swift, the musician who’s just as famous for her disagreements with music streaming companies as she is her long list of spurned lovers, has finally offered her opinion on Apple Music.
Two weeks after Apple released its new $10-a-month streaming service, the pop star wrote the company a public letter on her Tumblr, explaining why she’s withholding her latest album,1989, from the subscription-based platform.
Per the post, which went up Sunday morning:
“I’m
sure you are aware that Apple Music will be offering a free 3 month
trial to anyone who signs up for the service. I’m not sure you know that
Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those
three months. I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely
unlike this historically progressive and generous company.”
She went on, explaining that her decision was meant to be a signal of support for young, struggling musicians.
“These
are not the complaints of a spoiled, petulant child. These are the
echoed sentiments of every artist, writer and producer in my social
circles who are afraid to speak up publicly because we admire and
respect Apple so much. We simply do not respect this particular call.
I
realize that Apple is working towards a goal of paid streaming. I think
that is beautiful progress. We know how astronomically successful Apple
has been and we know that this incredible company has the money to pay
artists, writers and producers for the 3 month trial period… even if it
is free for the fans trying it out.
Three
months is a long time to go unpaid, and it is unfair to ask anyone to
work for nothing. I say this with love, reverence, and admiration for
everything else Apple has done. I hope that soon I can join them in the
progression towards a streaming model that seems fair to those who
create this music. I think this could be the platform that gets it
right.
But
I say to Apple with all due respect, it’s not too late to change this
policy and change the minds of those in the music industry who will be
deeply and gravely affected by this. We don’t ask you for free iPhones.
Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation.”
Swift made headlines last November when she pulled her entire catalog
from the subscription-based streaming service, Spotify. (Her
explanation then was that she wasn’t willing to contribute her life’s
work to an experiment). The CEO Daniel Ek fired back, mentioning that
Swift was on track to make $6 million in royalties from her contract with the company.
Swift’s
sparring with Internet companies is not limited to the music industry.
In February of this year, the cat-lover’s lawyers sent at least one
cease-and-desist letter to an Etsy store owner for selling merchandise
that contained her recently trademarked song lyrics.
Hey, in the words of the singer herself: [Insert literally any melodramatic Swift lyric about break-ups here.]
No comments:
Post a Comment